$1,730 recovered from a subscription cancelled three years earlier
He cancelled in the app and received no confirmation. Payments continued for thirty-eight months. The bank's own record of a phone call turned out to be stronger evidence than anything either party held.
Client: A shift worker who found four recurring payments he did not recognise
$1,730
Recovered including interest
38 months
Payments had been running
5 weeks
To resolution
What the client brought us
Our client signed up to a fitness content subscription during a free trial and cancelled inside the trial period using the in-app cancellation flow. He received no confirmation email and thought nothing more about it.
Thirty-eight months later, reviewing his account after changing jobs, he found $45.50 leaving monthly. The trader's position was that no cancellation had ever been received and that he had been free to cancel at any time.
He had no confirmation, no screenshot and no reference number, which is exactly the position an in-app cancellation flow tends to leave people in, and why these claims go unchallenged.
How we assessed it
We approached it from the bank's side rather than the trader's.
Two months after cancelling he had telephoned his bank to ask about the payments and had been told to contact the merchant. That call was logged. Under the rules on continuous payment authorities, a customer can instruct their bank to stop the payments and the bank must act — it cannot require the customer to resolve matters with the merchant first.
We requested the call recordings and contact notes by subject access request. The notes confirmed both the enquiry and the advice given. That made every payment taken after that date the bank's liability rather than the trader's.
Separately we examined how the trial terms had been presented at sign-up, using an archived version of the page. The auto-renewal disclosure sat below the fold behind a collapsed link, which supports a separate argument about prior information.
What we found
Bank told the customer to contact the merchant
A customer can cancel a continuous payment authority through their bank. Telling him otherwise, and not acting, made the subsequent payments the bank's responsibility.
No cancellation confirmation issued
The in-app flow produced no email, no reference and no on-screen record. Absence of evidence on the customer's side is not evidence that he did not cancel.
Auto-renewal disclosure below the fold
The archived sign-up page showed the renewal terms behind a collapsed link, supporting a separate argument on prior information.
The bank's own notes settled it
The contact record was the decisive evidence, and the client had no idea it existed.
How it was fixed
We put the claim to the bank for the thirty-six payments taken after the logged call, totalling $1,638 plus interest. The bank accepted liability and paid $1,730 within five weeks, without needing an Ombudsman referral.
The two payments taken before that call were pursued against the trader by chargeback and declined as out of time. We advised that the amount did not justify escalating and he agreed.
We also reviewed his statements for other recurring payments and found two more he had forgotten, worth $22 a month combined. He cancelled those himself and we did not charge for it.
Business result
- $1,730 recovered for thirty-six payments taken after a logged cancellation enquiry
- Liability established against the bank rather than an unresponsive trader
- Two further unwanted subscriptions identified and cancelled at no charge
- Resolved in five weeks without an Ombudsman referral
“I assumed it was my own fault for not checking. It had not occurred to me that ringing the bank three years ago would be the thing that saved it.”
Client, Bristol
More case outcomes
$6,200 kitchen deposit recovered from a $200 card payment
The installer took a deposit, missed three start dates, then dissolved the company. The provider initially refused because only $200 of the $6,200 had gone on the credit card, which…
- Total recovered
- $6,980 Total recovered
- Card payment that triggered liability
- $200 Card payment that triggered liability
- To reverse the initial refusal
- 11 days To reverse the initial refusal
$19,400 reimbursed after a bank blamed the customer for an impersonation scam
The bank refused reimbursement for gross negligence. It had not identified that the customer was recently bereaved, had not asked, and its warning did not address the scam that actually…
- Total recovered including interest
- $22,330 Total recovered including interest
- Refusals overturned
- 2 Refusals overturned
- From referral to settlement
- 19 weeks From referral to settlement
$8,900 recovered after a tour operator collapsed with the holiday unflown
They had been told to register with the administrators and wait. Registering was right; waiting was not. By the time they called us the window on the deposit was almost…
- Recovered in full
- $8,900 Recovered in full
- From first call to filing
- 4 days From first call to filing
- What the clock actually ran from
- Travel date What the clock actually ran from